martes, 19 de junio de 2012

CHANGES FOR WOMEN IN THE 70's


Silvia Sierra
2 infantil A
 
Changes for women in the 70’s  (SILVIA SIERRA)

The following oral history is the result of an interview with Blanca R. She was born in Burgos in 1959 and, when she was three, the family moved to a little industrial city in the Basque Country. She remembers the seventies as a time of changes. She lived in a changing society which would promote real equality between men and women.

In the early seventies women were simply wives and mothers. Only they had to carry out housework and care and education of children. Parents treated sons and daughters differently. She explains her own experience. Her father was a doctor and her mother did the housework and brought up children. She helped her mother in these activities. Neither her father nor her brothers involved in these tasks. She remembers that they were always assigned to the girls, not to the boys. And she didn’t challenge traditional gender roles, she didn’t complain about it. 

She explains that in the seventies, after getting married, a woman often assumed her new husband’s surname. The new couple often bought cards, reflecting their name; first of all, the husband’s name and surname and then wife’s name and surname and the expression “señora de” and her husband’s surname.
In her opinion, women simply accepted the situation because they were used to it. 

There were more inequalities and sexist attitudes. She explains that, in the early 70s, in her city there were single-sex public primary and secondary schools and only a mixed public secondary school, where she studied. However, boys were separated from girls in different classrooms. Later, boys and girls began to stay at the same classroom.  At the beginning, girls were sitting on the right of the classroom and boys, on the left. It was the same in the schoolyard. Boys played in one side and girls, in the other side. She remembers that, a few years later girls and boys sat together and stayed together in the schoolyard. During early 70s there were also some differences in the treatment of boys and girls in the classroom through different programs of study. She remembers that, while girls received sewing and musical instruction, boys learnt how to do manual wooden works. What is more, in Political and physical education, they had not only different lessons, but also different teachers. Boys had a man, girls had a woman. She also says that there was a law which obligated women to complete a period of Social Service training for motherhood. Boys had to do military service.

Inequalities also appear in matter of clothes. She remembers, for example, that girls had to cover their head with a veil in church. She also says that for several years they couldn’t wear bikini. Girls had to wear shorts under the skirt to do gymnastic and they weren’t allowed to wear trousers to go to school.
She explains that one day a friend of her was thrown out of the school due to the fact that she was wearing trousers.
She also says that she went to church every Monday and she and her friends helped teaching of the catechism. They sang sons and played the guitar with children in mass. There was no boy with them, just only the priest.

In the seventies there was a strict moral. She remembers that a priest scolded her parents’ friend because they were embracing each other in the street. Besides that, girls’ attitude was generally passive. Boys asked girls to dance. They decided when to begin a romance. Parents didn’t accept that their daughter could live with a man without being married. What is more, she says that if a man and a woman wanted to go to a hotel, they were asked to show their family book in order to justify that they were married.

But over the year gender differences were in a process of change. Traditional Spanish social values and attitudes were modified and so were the role and the situation of women. Steps were taken to improve women’s status and gender differences began to disappear. But changing unequal gender roles and relations takes time.

She says that the end of the decade was a time of great transition and a period of change for women in Spain. Gender differences were reduced in this decade. Like her, many other girls expected to have a job and to be independent. In the last seventies women increased their presence at University. However, in some studies, like Engineer or Economist, women only represented a minority. She explains that in her brother’s class, who studied Engineer, there was no girl, and in her brother’s class, who studied Economist, the rate was smaller for girls, only five percent. She thinks these studies had been traditionally considered masculine studies. Her parents and her brothers encouraged her to study at University. And she wanted it too. She began her studies at University in 1976. She didn’t remember any kind of differences there. What is more, as women had been accepted their expected roles in family and society, it is in the University where she had the opportunity to know that there was a discriminatory legislation and women were on a subordinate position to men.
So she explains that, until 1975, women needed their husbands’ authorization in order to access to a formal job, to sign contracts, to purchase goods, to open a bank account and to carry economic activities.  Norms were not flexible about cohabitation or having children outside the marital relationship and the sale of contraceptives was banned. But these restrictions disappeared and some legal measures were approved reducing discrimination against women.
She thinks that these improvements could be associated with the new political system, with the democracy, even to the benefits of the tourism.
So, she explains that in 1978 Constitution was passed. And this norm stipulates that the Spaniards are equal for the law, being forbidden any kind of discrimination due to sex. In spite of that, she still remembers some vestiges of a sexist society.


 SILVIA SIERRA

lunes, 18 de junio de 2012

Essay on the coming of democracy in Spain with death of Franco and the Transición toward democratic institutions



I’ve always wondered how would be like to live in the postwar period, in a dictatorship  and what historical facts were schocking, so I talked to my neighbor, Pilar and she told me how was it. Begining with Spanish ‘transition’ I have to say that it was the era when Spain moved from Franco's dictatorship to a liberal democratic State. The 'Transition' is usually said to have begun with Franco's death on 20 November 1975, there is not an exact date of this period, to be clear. Others said that is linked to the Spanish Constitution of 1978 or to the appointment of Juan Carlos I as Kings of Spain 22 November of 1975, and it finish with the failure of an attempted coup on 23 February 1981 or the electoral victory of the PSOE on 28 October 1982. The general dates for the end of 'Transition' are 1982 and 1986. This topic had a huge relevance in Spain's history in so much as it changed the way of live, the rights, the freedom and the society.
The purpose of this essay is to show how live was in Franco's dictatorship and what happened when he died. I'm going to focus on three points: before democracy(Franco's dictatorship) democracy and democracy institutions. 


Before the arrival of democracy in Spain, there was a dictatorship led by Franco (1939-1975) His regime was autarkic, step of fascism totalitarianism to authoritarian dictatorship. Franco took control of Spanish lives through censorship and education.
In 1939 the ‘ Ley de responsabilidades políticas’ was establish  and  Franco’s regime started to select the cultural workers (journalists…) All directors of the newspapers and magazines had to be named by the state and they should be falangist.  

In the repression there were a lot of executions. In the postwar prisons there were people who lived in poor conditions. There was a society where defeated people were excluded from social, cultural, intellectual and political life.I talked to my neighbor and she told me: ‘There were restrictions, and no freedom to say what you think or do what you want. Also I remember that we had so much hunger, my mom said to me that there was a rye bread that was so dark and she said that that bread was poison, I was so hungry that I said: I want some of that poison’I asked Pilar, my neighbor, about what did Franco bring to Spain, and she told me that with him there were no violence in the streets and everything was undercontrol. Also we talked about her daily life in Franco's dictatorship and she said: 'Daily life in Franco's dictatorship wasn't like now, I woke up and went to school in the morning and in the afternoon too. I went t school until I was 14 years old and on Thursday there were no class, the timetable was: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday' 'They won't leave us go to Madrid and at 9.30 or 22.00 PM we must be at home' 


In this period there was also an economic repression, but in 60's there was an economic development with 'Plan de estabilizacion' supported by FMI and OCDE. From an agrarian society, Spain advanced to a more industrial society. In education there were advances and the schooling reached 90% also, women started to incorporate to work and studies. At this time, there were social mobilizations like CCOO with the union platform and there were claims on the street. 



Franco died on 20 of November of 1975. As my neighbor says: ' His death as a person shocked me, I felt ir because it was the only thing I knew until then. I saw how his wife Carmen Polo was leaving their house...' The Juan Carlos accepted the terms of Franco's legislation and is named King of Spain. My neighbor ways: 'I remember the naming of Juan Carlos as King of Spain and I liked it, I didn't liked the idea of a Republic'. Then 'Transition' started.
As she told me the change from dictatorship to democracy was good because people started to have more freedom but also there were facts that shocked her, like the strikes. When there were strikes out in the street, she was so scared, she felt fear and she remembers that with Franco’s dictatorship she wasn’t afraid.Also, she remembers 23F, and the murdered of some laboralist lawyers. It was a shock to her because in Franco’s period you couldn’t do anything and there was no violence and then these things happened and she never saw something like that.
As historical facts in ‘Transition’ there was a new law, ‘Ley fundamental’ for political reformation. On 15 of June of 1977 there were elections and the formation of democracy in Spain started. My neighbor remembers that that was the first time she could vote, and that she felt like a women and like if now she have rights. ‘It felt good’
The first government of monarchy was Arias Navarro’s. This government didn’t predict a huge change in politics, but some reformist ministers joined to the new government like Fraga, Areilza or Garrigues. They created the law of ‘Reunion y Manifestacion’ and ‘Asociaciones politicas’.
There were an opposition group that was growing and there were a lot of demonstrations claiming for amnesty. In Pais Vasco the tension was growing and especially ETA. There were a few terrorism bands like GRAPO, ETA and Tardofranquista. 
Then Adolfo Suarez was a government and then UCD and in 1978 there was a constitution. Then PSOE was in charge of the government and then PP. Later we entered in Economic European community and in OTAN. We developed our education and our economy still in crises.



In general, this period of history is complicated because there are no exact dates, and everything was changing, from lifestyle to politics, economy…
Before 1975 people didn’t know a lot about democracy or freedom of expression, they only knew Franco’s dictatorship and how was to live with repression, poverty and hunger. Although Franco’s dictatorship wasn’t a good period for Spain, when it changed to democracy, everything was new to people. Talking to my neighbor made me realize that that change shocked people and it was hard, but they got through it. Even though my neighbor was a postwar child, and lived in poverty almost all her live, she was happy to be with her family.
This was Franco’s dictatorship and the ‘Transition’ period through a contrast of oral history and facts of history.   




Maite Santolaya Pascual

*I had to put it in color because if not the text won't be  seen  properly 


THE FEMINIST MOVEMENT ESSAY

THE FEMINIST MOVEMENT  (Ana San Frutos)


Is it fair that a woman has to ask permission to her husband to open a bank account? Until the 50's the life of Ana Tudón (my grandmother) depended on her father or her husband when she got married. She is the person interviewed, and her personal experience is reflected in this essay.

Because of the feminist movement that began in Spain in the last fifteen years, in the nineteenth century the thinking of many women changed. This movement advocated gender equality related with the laws. One of the women who fought to change that way of thinking about women in society was my grandmother. She fought in her personal situation, like many other women. In this essay we will explain some of the most important aspects of woman life in those years, which shows the lack of freedom that they had to drive their life. I am going to talk about marriage and it consequences. It is important to relate the marriage with the employment status of women, that it was related to the total economic dependence they had on their husbands and social pressure by seeking some independence. I also will point out the appearance of contraceptive methods. The last point will be education that helped women gradually to get more independence in their lives.



Learn to sew, cook well, take into account her husband needs… Girls were educated in order to stay at home with the children and prepare the house, while her husband controlled the economy in the house. When my grandmother was 12, his parents could only pay the studies for one of their children. My grandmother had a brother, Julio, and he received the formal education, because their parents considerer that my grandmother wouldn’t need the education for her future. Even many of the women who had the privilege of having some college education did not come to practice. When my grandmother was 16 she found a job that provided some economic freedom, but with the little salary that she earned, she had to help her parents to pay his brother studies. Years later, when she talked with her boss and told him that she was going to get married she was discharged immediately. This is one of the situations that all women found when they decided to get married.


Married or single, all women needed permission from a male, whether her husband, father or brother for any economic process. When my grandmother got married several years later, she got permission from my grandfather to find a part-time job. He thought that this would be good for the economy of the house, provided she wouldn’t neglect her work or at home. In the new job, one of the conditions was to open a bank account. When my grandmother went to the bank will not let her to open the account without the permission and signature of her husband, and even that has had to be in the name of the two. In addition, male co-workers of my grandmother charge a 20 percent more for the same job.


Social pressure at the time was very strong, both by men and women themselves. My grandmother considers that she was a lucky woman, in the sense that her husband was a very permissive person, compared with the other man of the moment. He went to buy bread!, something that was surprisingly, in those days. Returning from church on Sunday, he went to the kiosk, bought the newspaper and approached the bakery, and wrapped the bread in the newspaper, so he was more hidden and not have to hear the typical phrases like "wimp". On the other hand, my grandmother decided to get a driving license (for which also had to have the consent of my grandfather). The comments among women in the building soon to appear (perhaps in part to feel that another woman had an independence that they would like to have), not to mention the insults that many men directed to women who were driving on the roads.


As I mentioned earlier, women were educated to have children and take care of the house. The appearance of contraceptive methods helped women to decide when they wanted to be mothers, and delaying motherhood. But in these years was still frowned upon to use them. As many people say, information is power, and gradually had a greater number of women studying in Spanish universities. The training allows the development of critical thinking, to create your own opinion and that's something nobody can take away. Because of education women had increasingly criterion of choice, and drive their lives. This is how my grandmother educated her daughters, instilling the idea of ​​being an independent person.


In conclusion, we must continue fighting for equality between men and women, because despite the great changes that have been happening over the last 50 years there are still things to change, because even today there are women for pay less than men for equal work. Social pressure is one of the things that have been more difficult to change, because you can act on your feminist ideals, but people around you, that in most situations the social pressure was enormous.

To finish I want to share a phrase that my grandmother always says and that I think can summarize the topic perfectly:  “The freedom of women is in their economic independence”. 


ANA SAN FRUTOS 


viernes, 11 de mayo de 2012

Another old entrie


MIÉRCOLES, 25 DE ABRIL DE 2012

Hi!
We are Ana San Frutos, Maite Santolaya, Silvia Sierra and Carolina Cortondo.
What we are going to do in this blog during this semester is share with you our project of investigation and how we are going to develop it.
Our project is based on the study of the different neighborhood of Madrid.

The index we are going to work on is Barajas, Chamberí and Aravaca-Moncloa and our target is a middle class family with children of 4 and 6 years old. We will compare this three neighborhoods and decide wich is the best one to live in for this kind of family.
Publicado por CCSS en 01:10 0 comentarios http://img2.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif

Old entrie

For some reason we don't know, our older entries have been deleted. So we are posting them again.

VIERNES, 4 DE MAYO DE 2012
Before showing you  our indicators and factors, we are going to specify the neighborhoods of each area.
WE HAVE CHANGE one of the area choosen:

-Barajas: we have choosen Alameda de Osuna
-Barrio Salamanca: Goya
-Moncloa-Aravaca: Francos Rodríguez.

The factors we are going to investigate are:

*Quality of education, the indicators of this factor are:
-number of schools.
-Reports about these schools.
 
-number of sport centres.
 

*Transports (comunication)
-underground stations
-bus stops
 
-parkings

*Feeding:
-markets
-supermarkets (relation quality-price, and proximity)
-other little shops related with this (bakery, fishery...)
 

*Healthy
-pharmacy
-hospital

*Silence and quiet
-discos (are not important for our family)
-crime/violence

*free time
-comercial centres
-parks (improtant for families with children)
-cinemas
-restaurants
 

*Cost of living
-rent (can give you the idea of the cost of living of the area, because of the situation)
-oil prices
-diary menu
 
-inmigration (used to live in cheaper areas)

Those factors have been choosen because we think these are the factors that influence the families in the choice of the place they want to live and are  important to evaluate the different neighborhoods for a family with children.
Publicado por CCSS en 04:01 2 comentarios http://img2.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif

Complete Project


Have you ever thought about having children in a future? During these minutes I want you to imagine that this girl is your daughter.



I suppose that you would like the best things for your daughter, and we ask you a question, which do you think is the best neighborhood to live with your daughter? With this project we are going to give you the solution!
Let’s explain how we made this project. Firstly, we invented a model of family to choose wich neighborhood would be the best for them. Our family is formed by a couple and two kids of 4 and 6 years old, and they’re around 1500 euros each month.
Secondly, we had to choose three different neighborhoods of Madrid to find out which one is the best for our family. We choose Goya, from Salamanca district, this neighborhood is situated in the centre of Madrid and it belongs to a commercial zone. Then, Francos Rodriguez, it belongs to Moncloa-Aravaca district.
And the last neighborhood we choose was Alameda, whose district is Barajas, and is in the Norwest of Madrid.
We have made a model of neighborhood to find the best to this type of family
As factors and indicators, we choose these: 
*Education: for us is the most important factor to choose a neighborhood, we have given 35% of importance with a maximum of 15 centers including schools, libraries, academies… . We have taken into account the number of schools and academies of each area.
*Transport: related with mobility, is the second one more important. If a neighborhood has good communication, the family won’t have problems to move on public transport. We consider that it has a 20% of importance The maximum is 15 lines between metro and bus.
Because of we consider the transport a very important factor (apart from education), the rest of them will have less importance.
*Entertainment (parks, cinemas, restaurants…) has an importance of  12%  with a maximum of 3 centers.
*Feeding (taking into account markets and supermarkets in each area) 15% with a maximum of 15 centers.
*Healthcare (hospitals and pharmacies) 10% with a maximum of 2 centers.
*Cost of living (price of rent a flat) 8% with a maximum of 700 € each month

We have count the number of centers of each factor in the three neighborhoods, so we could compare them we our ideal neighborhood to choose the best one. Those are the results:
   
FACTORS/ NEIGHBORHOODS
GOYA
FR
ALAMEDA
EDUCATION
35%
116.7%
16%
Communication-Transport
9,33%
17%
10.6%
Feeding
33%
100%
8%
Health
135%
116.7%
10%
Leisure
56%
24%
8%
COST OF LIVING
14,12%
6.6%
5.6%
TOTAL
282.45%
264.3%
58,2%























To sum up,
We have seen that there are a lot of differences between these neighborhoods.
As a conclusion we think that the best neighborhood for this family is Alameda de Osuna.
It’s a little bit far from the city center but it has a very good communication. This family will can go to ever they want by car, underground or bus.
The cost of the rent of Alameda de Osuna is cheaper than in the other neighborhoods, so it’s a very important thing.